Kinya Ogawa
Shin-Etsu Chemical Company, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract - The key factors determining the successful application of the mating disruption technique for insect control are reviewed. The composition of the disruptant blend of chemicals must be optimized in field tests. A satisfactory dispenser technology comprises sufficient release rates and dispenser life; the protection of the active ingredient; and a convenient application method. Air temperature and wind velocity determine release rates and aerial pheromone concentrations. Mating disruption works best in area-wide treatments, a large enough amount of chemicals must be applied early enough in season, before emergence of the target species. Population densities of the pest species and natural enemies, as well as economic damage thresholds play a decisive role.
Key words - sex pheromone, mating disruption, controlled release dispensers, integrated pest management, codling moth, Cydia pomonella, pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella, Lepidoptera
Examples for failures of mating disruption
[top]
There are many factors determining the effect of mating disruption. The failures experienced in field tests over the past decade may help us to determine the most critical ones. In four of nine cases, late application of the dispenser material was responsible, as farmers and researchers tend to apply pheromone dispensers at the same time as insecticide sprays. For example, the first generation of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella, causes no damage and sometimes dispensers are applied only against the second generation. This is not a problem at a low population density, but if the population builds up, the efficacy of the treatment against the second generation goes down considerably (Table 1). Even if the results were good for some years, there is a potential risk in treating only against the second generation.
A lack of stability of the active ingredients was responsible for failures with rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis, and codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Low pheromone release rates during early season, problems with the dispenser system, and a low population of natural enemies were the other problems identified.
| Application date | Boll damage (%) | |
Second half of July | First half of August | |
| May 14 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| May 18 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| May 30 | 8.0 | 11.3 |
| June 10 | 13.3 | 28.0 |
Judging from the unsuccessful cases, the conditions required to achieve a good efficacy in mating disruption are outlined below.
Adequate controlled-release technology
[top]
Aerial pheromone concentrations of 1 to 10 ng/m3 should be maintained in the crop, depending on the insect species and population density. The ideal dispenser system is required to fulfill the following properties:
Active ingredient
The composition of the disruptant blend of chemicals can be different from the female sex pheromone (Figure 1; Table 2). Therefore, the active ingredients used in the dispensers must be determined by field trials. Apart from a few exceptions, chemical impurities have no negative effect on mating disruption.
Table 2 Active ingredients used for mating disruption in relation to female sex pheromones
Species | Compounda | Composition of | Disruptant | |
| Attractant (%) a | Disruptant (%) | |||
Pectinophora gossypiella | Z7,Z11-16Ac | 50 | 50 | Pheromone |
Z7,E11-16Ac | 50 | 50 | ||
| Carposina niponensis | Z7-20-11Kt | 95 | 100 | Main component |
| Z7-19-11Kt | 5 | 0 | ||
| Adoxophyes spec. | Z9-14Ac | 61 | ||
| Z11-14Ac | 31 | 100 | Minor component | |
| E11-14Ac | 4 | |||
| 10me-12Ac | 2 | |||
| Epiphyas postvittana | E11-14Ac | 95 | 66 | Off-blend |
| E9,E11-14Ac | 5 | 5 | ||
| Z11-14Ac | - | 29 | ||
| a see Arn et al. (1992, 1996) | ||||
Release rates and dispenser life
Zero order release rate is a very important characteristic of pheromone dispensers. Many dispensers have a rather high release rate in the beginning, which gradually decreases within a few weeks (Figure 2). Isomate-C dispensers contain a 60:30:1-blend of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadienol (E8,E10-12OH; codlemone), dodecanol (12OH) and tetradecanol (14OH) at 203 mg/dispenser. These dispensers still contain 75 mg after 140 days and will continue to be effective for another 30 days.
Figure 2 Release rates of three dispensers for mating disruption of codling moth, C. pomonella (Gut et al. pers. comm.; Washington State University)
In order to allow for a too rapid decrease in release rates, a split application is recommended for pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, in Egypt; some dispenser types should be applied two or three times, at short intervals. However, this is not a satisfactory approach. Efforts should therefore be made to develop a zero order release system, which is almost achieved by PB-rope dispensers (Figure 3).
Figure 3 Split application of dispensers recommended against pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, in Egypt
Quite obviously, a temperature-independent release system would be preferable, as currently available dispensers release high amounts of pheromone uselessly during daytime. We measured aerial concentrations in a pheromone-treated field and found that the pheromone concentrations are almost constant, regardless of different release rates at different temperatures. It seems that strong convection flows carry the pheromone upwards into the sky at high temperatures (during daytime; in summer).
Another, most important factor is wind velocity (Tables 3, 4). An ideal dispenser should release pheromone proportional to wind velocity at low wind speeds; but should release less at strong winds, when no mating activity occurs. A dangerous situation arises from decreased release rates after periods of continuously strong winds (Figure 4).
Dispenser life is obviously a most important property. Short-life dispensers cannot absorb the change of climatic conditions, they are much less reliable at hot temperatures. There is also the problem to properly time the next application.
| Wind velocity (m/s) | Release rate (mg/hr/ha) | Concentration (ng/m3) | |
| A | 1.0 | 204 | 2.5 |
| B | 2.5 | 235 | 1.2 |
| B/A | 2.5 | 1.15 | 0.48 |
Wind velocity | Dispenser life (d) | Dosage (dispenser/ha) | |
Multan, Pakistan | 0.5 to 1.5 | 70 to 90 | <500 |
| Parana, Brazil | 1.0 to 1.5 | 70 to 80 | 500 |
| Hubei, China | 1.0 to 2.0 | 65 to 75 | 500 |
| Sharkia, Egypt | 1.5 to 2.5 | 60 to 70 | 750 |
| Phoenix, USA | 1.5 to 2.5 | 60 to 70 | 750 |
| Imperial Valley, USA | 3.0 to 4.0 | 40 to 50 | 1000 |
Stability of active ingredient
Aldehyde pheromones are easily oxidized to acids. Therefore, antioxidants and UV-adsorbers are usually added to the active ingredient, as well as to the polymers in the dispenser wall.
Pheromones also polymerize to form oligomers. Aldehydes easily form trimers. Isomerization is quite common in compounds with conjugated double bonds. Stabilizers and UV adsorbers are added to protect the compounds against these reactions.
Under certain conditions, acetates are hydrolyzed to the alcohol and acetic acid by fungi (Table 5).
| Reaction | Pheromone compound | Product | Stabilizer |
| Oxidation | aldehyde | acid | UV absorber, antioxidant |
| Polymerization | aldehyde | trimer | radical absorber, pH adjustment |
| conjugated diene | oligomer | UV absorber, filler in polymer | |
| Isomerization | conjugated diene | isomer | UV absorber, filler in polymer |
| Hydrolysis | acetate | alcohol | fungicide |
Others
The development of a degradable dispenser is desirable. Sprayable dispensers would be much better than existing dispensers, but it is very difficult to develop long-life sprayable dispensers.
Number of treatments
Area-wide application of mating disruption is recommended for a number
of reasons. One is that a comparatively higher pheromone dose is required for
small fields, and that the cost of mating disruption is therefore not
competitive with insecticide treatments. A rough estimation is that a ten times
larger field requires only half the pheromone dosage/ha, compared to a small
field. Population control of pink bollworm at late season tends to be much more
efficient in larger areas, which results in a smaller first generation the next
year, thus further increasing the efficacy of pheromone treatments (Tables 6,
7; Figure 5).
In larger treatments, the effect of immigrating gravid females is less critical
and populations of natural enemies are expected to be higher.
Surrounding
Mating disruption is usually designed to control one target species.
Other minor pests are in part effectively controlled by their natural enemies,
which benefit from the reduction of pesticide treatments. However, after
insecticide sprays, the efficacy of pheromone treatment, also with respect to
the target pest, is decreasing. And other species become more virulent and must
be treated with additional pheromone compounds or insecticide sprays (Table 8).
Conventional pest control
Insecticide
Total
Tea tortrix
The use of insecticide sprays is known to induce serious secondary pests. One
well-known example are gradations of mites as a result of pyrethroid sprays.
Insecticides are not always efficient to control even the target species, due
the induction of insecticide-resistant strains and their negative effect on
beneficials (Table 9).
Crop
Pome fruit Cotton
The threshold of economically tolerable damage is a very important
factor. In Japan, New Zealand and South Africa, the threshold of apple pests is
0.1% or lower, while it is between 1 and 2% in other countries. At extremely
low population densities, the natural enemies are not blessed with enough food
and their activity, therefore, remains low.
At extremely high pest population densities, on the other hand, mating
disruption is often not effective and curative insecticide sprays must be
applied initially.
Conclusion
We have much confidence in the efficacy of the mating disruption
technique, if good dispensers releasing sufficient amounts of the proper active
ingredients are applied at an early stage in area-wide control systems, in the
presence of natural enemies.
References
Arn H, Tóth M, Priesner E (1992) List of sex pheromones of
Lepidoptera and related attractants, 2nd edition. Montfavet: International
Organization for Biological Control
Arn H, Tóth M, Priesner E (1996) The pherolist. Internet edition:
http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/pheronet
Larvae/1000 bolls Cost
(US$/acre) Cotton quality Pheromone Insecticide August Sept. Pheromone Insecticide Total
1985 0 11.4 8.5 8.8 0 114 114 bad 6
a 10.4 9 20.8 36 104 140 bad 1 6.6 3.2 3.9 40 66 106 fair 1990 0 9.3 4
to 5 b - 0 93 93 fair 1 1.8 1
to 3 b - 40 18 58 good 2 1 0 - 80 10 90 excellent a Sprayable dispenser; b estimated
pheromone-treated fields
Number
of
fieldsMale trap catch Larval infestation of bolls (%) July
1-15 July
15-30 July
1-15 July
15-30 August
1-15 <=
1 3 0.7 1 0 2 16 0
to 4 24 0.8 3.8 0.4 2.1 4.8 5
to 8 19 0.5 2.1 0.1 0.7 0.8 8 2 0 0 0 1.5 0.5
Integrated
pest management Number
of insecticide sprays/season
11.2 9.8 Pyrethroid 1
to 4 0 Imidacloprid 1
to 2 0 Pest
species Infestation
(larvae/m2)
5.5 1.2 Thrips 49.9 23.1 Scale 7.7 4.3
Target
pest Non-target
pests
Increasing Decreasing Codling
moth Leafrollers
(in part)Leafminers
Mites, Aphids
Psylla (pear)
Cabbage Diamondback
moth Cabbage
looper Whitefly, Mites Pink
bollworm Egyptian
cotton leafworm
Whitefly, Mites
American bollworm