<- Montpellier papers

The key to success in mating disruption

Kinya Ogawa

Shin-Etsu Chemical Company, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract - The key factors determining the successful application of the mating disruption technique for insect control are reviewed. The composition of the disruptant blend of chemicals must be optimized in field tests. A satisfactory dispenser technology comprises sufficient release rates and dispenser life; the protection of the active ingredient; and a convenient application method. Air temperature and wind velocity determine release rates and aerial pheromone concentrations. Mating disruption works best in area-wide treatments, a large enough amount of chemicals must be applied early enough in season, before emergence of the target species. Population densities of the pest species and natural enemies, as well as economic damage thresholds play a decisive role.

Key words - sex pheromone, mating disruption, controlled release dispensers, integrated pest management, codling moth, Cydia pomonella, pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella, Lepidoptera

Examples for failures of mating disruption
[top]

There are many factors determining the effect of mating disruption. The failures experienced in field tests over the past decade may help us to determine the most critical ones. In four of nine cases, late application of the dispenser material was responsible, as farmers and researchers tend to apply pheromone dispensers at the same time as insecticide sprays. For example, the first generation of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella, causes no damage and sometimes dispensers are applied only against the second generation. This is not a problem at a low population density, but if the population builds up, the efficacy of the treatment against the second generation goes down considerably (Table 1). Even if the results were good for some years, there is a potential risk in treating only against the second generation.

A lack of stability of the active ingredients was responsible for failures with rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis, and codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Low pheromone release rates during early season, problems with the dispenser system, and a low population of natural enemies were the other problems identified.

Table 1 The effect of the time of dispenser application for mating disruption of pink bollworm, P. gossypiella

Application date Boll damage (%)

Second half of July

First half of August
May 141.72.3
May 182.82.5
May 308.011.3
June 1013.328.0

Judging from the unsuccessful cases, the conditions required to achieve a good efficacy in mating disruption are outlined below.

Adequate controlled-release technology
[top]

Aerial pheromone concentrations of 1 to 10 ng/m3 should be maintained in the crop, depending on the insect species and population density. The ideal dispenser system is required to fulfill the following properties:

Active ingredient

The composition of the disruptant blend of chemicals can be different from the female sex pheromone (Figure 1; Table 2). Therefore, the active ingredients used in the dispensers must be determined by field trials. Apart from a few exceptions, chemical impurities have no negative effect on mating disruption.

Figure 1 Mating disruptant effect of (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate, (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate, and a 1:9 blend of these compounds, against summerfruit tortrix, Adoxophyes orana, in the laboratory. Bars with different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05; analysis of variance)

Table 2 Active ingredients used for mating disruption in relation to female sex pheromones

Species

Compounda Composition ofDisruptant
Attractant (%) a Disruptant (%)

Pectinophora gossypiella

Z7,Z11-16Ac5050Pheromone

Z7,E11-16Ac

5050
Carposina niponensisZ7-20-11Kt95100Main component
Z7-19-11Kt50
Adoxophyes  spec.Z9-14Ac
61


Z11-14Ac31100Minor component
E11-14Ac4

10me-12Ac2

Epiphyas postvittanaE11-14Ac9566Off-blend
E9,E11-14Ac55
Z11-14Ac-29

a see Arn et al. (1992, 1996)

Release rates and dispenser life

Zero order release rate is a very important characteristic of pheromone dispensers. Many dispensers have a rather high release rate in the beginning, which gradually decreases within a few weeks (Figure 2). Isomate-C dispensers contain a 60:30:1-blend of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadienol (E8,E10-12OH; codlemone), dodecanol (12OH) and tetradecanol (14OH) at 203 mg/dispenser. These dispensers still contain 75 mg after 140 days and will continue to be effective for another 30 days.

Figure 2 Release rates of three dispensers for mating disruption of codling moth, C. pomonella (Gut et al. pers. comm.; Washington State University)

In order to allow for a too rapid decrease in release rates, a split application is recommended for pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, in Egypt; some dispenser types should be applied two or three times, at short intervals. However, this is not a satisfactory approach. Efforts should therefore be made to develop a zero order release system, which is almost achieved by PB-rope dispensers (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Split application of dispensers recommended against pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, in Egypt

Quite obviously, a temperature-independent release system would be preferable, as currently available dispensers release high amounts of pheromone uselessly during daytime. We measured aerial concentrations in a pheromone-treated field and found that the pheromone concentrations are almost constant, regardless of different release rates at different temperatures. It seems that strong convection flows carry the pheromone upwards into the sky at high temperatures (during daytime; in summer).

Another, most important factor is wind velocity (Tables 3, 4). An ideal dispenser should release pheromone proportional to wind velocity at low wind speeds; but should release less at strong winds, when no mating activity occurs. A dangerous situation arises from decreased release rates after periods of continuously strong winds (Figure 4).

Dispenser life is obviously a most important property. Short-life dispensers cannot absorb the change of climatic conditions, they are much less reliable at hot temperatures. There is also the problem to properly time the next application.

Table 3 Relation between wind velocity, release rates and aerial pheromone concentration

 Wind velocity
(m/s)
Release rate
(mg/hr/ha)
Concentration
(ng/m3)
A1.02042.5
B2.52351.2
B/A2.51.150.48

Table 4 Dispenser life (PB-rope) in relation to wind at various locations


Wind velocity
(m/s)

Dispenser life
(d)
Dosage
(dispenser/ha)

Multan, Pakistan

0.5 to 1.570 to 90<500
Parana, Brazil1.0 to 1.570 to 80500
Hubei, China1.0 to 2.065 to 75500
Sharkia, Egypt1.5 to 2.560 to 70750
Phoenix, USA1.5 to 2.560 to 70750
Imperial Valley, USA3.0 to 4.040 to 501000

Figure 4 Release rates from two dispenser types after periods of strong wind

Stability of active ingredient

Aldehyde pheromones are easily oxidized to acids. Therefore, antioxidants and UV-adsorbers are usually added to the active ingredient, as well as to the polymers in the dispenser wall.

Pheromones also polymerize to form oligomers. Aldehydes easily form trimers. Isomerization is quite common in compounds with conjugated double bonds. Stabilizers and UV adsorbers are added to protect the compounds against these reactions.

Under certain conditions, acetates are hydrolyzed to the alcohol and acetic acid by fungi (Table 5).

Table 5 Stability of active ingredient

ReactionPheromone compoundProductStabilizer
OxidationaldehydeacidUV absorber, antioxidant
Polymerizationaldehydetrimerradical absorber,
pH adjustment
conjugated dieneoligomerUV absorber, filler in polymer
Isomerizationconjugated dieneisomerUV absorber, filler in polymer
Hydrolysisacetatealcoholfungicide

Others

The development of a degradable dispenser is desirable. Sprayable dispensers would be much better than existing dispensers, but it is very difficult to develop long-life sprayable dispensers.

Table 6 Small-scale (1985) and large-scale (1990) application of mating disruption with PB-rope for control of pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, in cotton fields (Imperial Valley, USA)


Number of treatments

Larvae/1000 bollsCost (US$/acre)Cotton quality
PheromoneInsecticideAugustSept.PheromoneInsecticideTotal
1985011.48.58.80114114bad
6 a10.4920.836104140bad
16.63.23.94066106fair
199009.34 to 5 b-09393fair
11.81 to 3 b-401858good
210-801090excellent

a Sprayable dispenser; b estimated

Area-wide application
[top]

Area-wide application of mating disruption is recommended for a number of reasons. One is that a comparatively higher pheromone dose is required for small fields, and that the cost of mating disruption is therefore not competitive with insecticide treatments. A rough estimation is that a ten times larger field requires only half the pheromone dosage/ha, compared to a small field. Population control of pink bollworm at late season tends to be much more efficient in larger areas, which results in a smaller first generation the next year, thus further increasing the efficacy of pheromone treatments (Tables 6, 7; Figure 5).

In larger treatments, the effect of immigrating gravid females is less critical and populations of natural enemies are expected to be higher.

Table 7 Effect of treatment of neighbouring cotton fields on control of pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, by mating disruption

Surrounding
pheromone-treated fields

Number of
fields
Male trap catchLarval infestation of bolls (%)
July 1-15July 15-30July 1-15July 15-30August 1-15
<= 130.710216
0 to 4240.83.80.42.14.8
5 to 8190.52.10.10.70.8
820001.50.5

Figure 5 Percent boll infestation by pink bollworm, P. gossypiella, under Parker Valley PBW Suppression Program (1990-1992)

Natural enemies
[top]

Mating disruption is usually designed to control one target species. Other minor pests are in part effectively controlled by their natural enemies, which benefit from the reduction of pesticide treatments. However, after insecticide sprays, the efficacy of pheromone treatment, also with respect to the target pest, is decreasing. And other species become more virulent and must be treated with additional pheromone compounds or insecticide sprays (Table 8).

Table 8 Side effects of broad-spectrum insecticides


Conventional pest control

Integrated pest management

Insecticide

Number of insecticide sprays/season

Total

11.29.8
Pyrethroid1 to 40
Imidacloprid1 to 20
Pest speciesInfestation (larvae/m2)

Tea tortrix

5.51.2
Thrips49.923.1
Scale7.74.3

The use of insecticide sprays is known to induce serious secondary pests. One well-known example are gradations of mites as a result of pyrethroid sprays. Insecticides are not always efficient to control even the target species, due the induction of insecticide-resistant strains and their negative effect on beneficials (Table 9).

Table 9 Effect of mating disruption on non-target pests

Crop

Target pestNon-target pests
IncreasingDecreasing

Pome fruit

Codling mothLeafrollers
(in part)
Leafminers
Mites, Aphids
Psylla (pear)
CabbageDiamondback mothCabbage looperWhitefly, Mites

Cotton

Pink bollwormEgyptian
cotton leafworm
Whitefly, Mites
American bollworm

Control threshold
[top]

The threshold of economically tolerable damage is a very important factor. In Japan, New Zealand and South Africa, the threshold of apple pests is 0.1% or lower, while it is between 1 and 2% in other countries. At extremely low population densities, the natural enemies are not blessed with enough food and their activity, therefore, remains low.

At extremely high pest population densities, on the other hand, mating disruption is often not effective and curative insecticide sprays must be applied initially.

Conclusion

We have much confidence in the efficacy of the mating disruption technique, if good dispensers releasing sufficient amounts of the proper active ingredients are applied at an early stage in area-wide control systems, in the presence of natural enemies.

References

Arn H, Tóth M, Priesner E (1992) List of sex pheromones of Lepidoptera and related attractants, 2nd edition. Montfavet: International Organization for Biological Control

Arn H, Tóth M, Priesner E (1996) The pherolist. Internet edition: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/pheronet

[top]